Normality and Madness – distinct or non-separable Concepts? In the pages that I could appreciate with my reading, it was clearly the perception of that madness is seen of some angles, of some heads, and for the thoughts are changed there. It is noticed that it is easy to speak of the madness of the other, of this other people’s madness and to produce arguments of that wild he is who is contrary to the society, or better, of who he is contrary to its attitudes, its beliefs or the normality of the world. But it is enough to run away from a moral rule, fact, already has considered an insane person. But as we can say with as much freedom this word? Without the least terms the established knowledge to use it. It will be that we could call somewhat bad madness? Or only one liberty of speech is of the norms of the society? This subject on madness is very extensive and is necessary very well-taken care of to interpret it. Nowadays, the sense-common one believes in a madness located in the individual, transforms that it into monster thus tending to remove its statute of human being, as well as makes to forget us that something is said through madness.
The insane people are the ones that they know to look at the world with the eyes of the reality, and therefore are restrained of the society. According to Artaud, the authentic insane person would be that one that he preferred to go crazy (conscientiously or not), in the direction where socially if he understands the word, to trair certain superior idea of honor human being (moral rules). In mine to see, this opinion is celebrates and obtains to arrive at the abstract direction. As much that I will place in this summary all my points of view, not leaving to analyze all the others and not to be the favor nor against, but always to think the respect.