At the beginning these enriched individuals had started to supply to the substance cousin to speed up and to extend the production of the craftsman, later the few started to concentrate these workers in some places, for end, completely separated them of the means of production (the means of production are the tools, the necessary utensils the production of merchandises). The Industrial revolution consolidated this process, therefore with the use of the machines and the cercamento of communal lands an enormous number of people had been without having with what and where to work, it has seen, that the machines and everything that was necessary to produce merchandises in competitive way were accessible only to the rich individuals To the workers who had been separate of the means of production alone remain to vender a merchandise – since he does not produce more nothing or the merchandise that can produce not it is more advantageous for lacks of capacity for concurring? This merchandise is its force of work, its muscles, its ability, its intelligence, in other words, all its capacity. In general lines, therefore, it is of this form that the work force or as well as is called the hand workmanship if it becomes merchandise. From this moment it remains the worker but to vender its merchandise in exchange for force of work for the owners of the industries wage. This wants to say that the worker who was separate of the means of production if approaches again to them through the same people had moved away that it, however, this new union occurs on a new logic, logic this that unifies by means of the wage the worker and the means of production, but, however, makes to remain separate of the worker the product of its work, that is, what the worker produced does not belong to it, the product of its work is of who paid o its wage, of who bought its merchandise work force. Of this form one configures a relation of purchase and sales of the work force, therefore the worker vende its only merchandise and the capitalist purchase this merchandise when paying the wage.
For backwards of this relation of equality we find objections. It will be that the wage is just exactly when the worker well is remunerated? It will be that the work force does not generate more value of what is paid in wage form? The reply of the first question it is not, that is, it just does not exist wage on this look, has seen, that the ability, intelligence, in short, all capacity of the worker is ece of fish in action does not stop benefiting proper itself, they outrem but it, therefore, the remuneration of its work is inferior to the value created, therefore its effort it leaves its wage and profit of the detainer of the means of production, the capitalist Already how much the second question the reply is yes, for the fact, of the merchandise work force not to be a simple merchandise, therefore in contrast of excessively merchandises when used it generates value and not only are worn out. When used it transforms objects, it creates and recria products while the too much merchandises if spoil.
